MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238719045 · doi:10.1109/imtc.1990.65973

Calibration of an electronic measuring system for ultrasonic analysis of solutions

2002· article· en· W4238719045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationPolynomialInverseA priori and a posterioriInterpolation (computer graphics)Computer sciencePolynomial interpolationInverse problemPolynomial and rational function modelingSpline interpolationProcess (computing)AlgorithmApplied mathematicsMathematicsLinear interpolationArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisComputer visionStatisticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of calibrating a system for measuring the concentration of methanol in water is investigated. The inefficiency of polynomial and inverse-polynomial models used for this purpose is demonstrated. The cubic-spline interpolation is chosen and examined as a flexible means of calibration. A method for experimental validation of the results of calibration is proposed. The proposed method makes possible the utilization of a much greater amount of calibration data for improving the accuracy of calibration as compared with the polynomial and inverse-polynomial models, and requires much less a priori information on the relationships between quantities involved in the measurement process.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207