MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238721450 · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.10.1826

Effect of 5-HT<char aid="99740019" id="sub">1A</char> Receptor Gene Polymorphism on Negative and Depressive Symptom Response to Antipsychotic Treatment of Drug-Naive Psychotic Patients

2006· article· en· W4238721450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gavin P. Reynolds

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Psychiatry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntipsychoticPsychosisPositive and Negative Syndrome ScalePolymorphism (computer science)PsychiatryAtypical antipsychoticPsychologyDepression (economics)Depressive symptomsMedicineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Internal medicineClinical psychologyCognitionGenotypeGeneGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The serotonin 5-HT 1A receptor may modulate some of the negative, cognitive, and affective symptoms of schizophrenia and is a potential target of action of some antipsychotic drugs. A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the 5-HT 1A receptor gene is associated with depression and suicidal behavior. The authors sought to determine whether this polymorphism influences symptom response to antipsychotic drug treatment. Method: Sixty-three drug-naive patients with first-episode psychosis who were genotyped for the –1019C/G polymorphism were recruited for this study and received standard care. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Calgary Depression Scale were used to monitor symptom changes over 3 months. Results: The polymorphism was associated with, and accounted for much of the variance in, changes in negative and depressive symptoms but not positive symptoms. Conclusions: These findings identify an important genetic factor predicting much of the response in negative and depressive symptoms to antipsychotic drug treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of PsychiatrySame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207