MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238725807 · doi:10.1002/chem.200390251

Coordination Algorithms Control Molecular Architecture: [Cu<sup>I</sup><sub>4</sub>(L2)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>4+</sup> Grid Complex Versus [M<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(L2)<sub>2</sub>X<sub>4</sub>]<sup>y+</sup> Side‐By‐Side Complexes (M=Mn, Co, Ni, Zn; X=Solvent or Anion) and [Fe<sup>II</sup>(L2)<sub>3</sub>][Cl<sub>3</sub>Fe<sup>III</sup>OFe<sup>III</sup>Cl<sub>3</sub>]

2003· article· en· W4238725807 on OpenAlexaff
Yanhua Lan, Dietmar Kennepohl, Boujemaa Moubaraki, Keith S. Murray, J.D. Cashion, Geoffrey B. Jameson, Sally Brooker

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopperChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the caption for the cover picture in Issue 16 (1) d-Anisidine should read p-anisidine; copper(II) should read copper(I); [CuI4(L2)4]4+ should read [CuI4(L2)4]4+; [MII2(L2)2(X)4]y+ should read [MII2(L2)2(X)4]y+. The editorial office apologizes for these errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0150.016
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.008
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0130.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0120.005
Research integrity0.0050.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207