MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238789330 · doi:10.5558/tfc85345-3

National/International News / Nouvelles Nationales/Internationales

2009· article· en· W4238789330 on OpenAlexaffvenue
John Farrar, Bruce P. Dancik, Jan Volney, Cindy E. Prescott, D. G. Maynard, Dan Kneeshaw, Ron Ayling

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Forestry Chronicle · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Research and Practices
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

n conjunction with the Centennial of the Special Libraries Association of the United States, the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division conducted a poll to identify the 100 most influential journals of biology and medicine over the last 100 years, as chosen by librarian experts in the field. Chair Jean Crampon, University of Southern California, led the division in 2008, and in 2009, by Chair John Tebo, University of Cincinnati. Three panels consisting of 3 experts each were recruited from the DBIO membership. Each panel composed a series of voter preference questions comparing journals in categories of biology or medicine that fell within its areas of expertise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Forestry ChronicleSame topicMedical Research and PracticesFrench-language works237,207