Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Book Review." Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 2(3), pp. 73–74 Additional informationNotes on contributorsJanice BurnJanice M. Burn is currently Foundation Professor and Head of School of Management Information Systems at Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia. She is a "global academic" having previously worked in U.K., Canada, and Hong Kong. Her research interests relate primarily to strategic planning for information systems, particularly in global organizations. This has been extended to cross-cultural studies and she has published extensively in these fields. Her latest book edited with Maris Martinson, and published in 1997 is "Information Technology and the Challenges for Hong Kong." She is a global associate editor of the Journal of Global Information technology Management (JGITM) and a book review editor for the Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications (JITCA).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it