MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238797078 · doi:10.1542/gr.38-2-17

Point-of-Care US and Nonangulated Forearm Fractures

2017· article· en· W4238797078 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAAP Grand Rounds · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineForearmEmergency departmentIconPoint of care ultrasoundCitationSurgeryLibrary scienceNursingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Source: Poonai N, Myslik F, Joubert G, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound for nonangulated distal forearm fractures in children: test performance characteristics and patient-centered outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 24(5): 607– 616; doi: 10.1111/acem.13146Researchers from multiple Canadian institutions conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the utility of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in children with suspected nonangulated distal forearm fractures. Children were eligible if they were 4–17 years old and presented to the study emergency department (ED) with a suspected nonangulated distal forearm fracture, defined as maximal pain and tenderness at the distal third of the forearm after an acute fall on an outstretched hand. Each participant underwent radiography and POCUS of the distal ulna and radius. POCUS was performed and interpreted by 4 POCUS-certified pediatric ED physicians with at least 2 years of POCUS experience who were not involved in the patient’s care. POCUS evaluators were blinded to the radiographs, and radiography technicians and radiologists were blinded to POCUS interpretations. Each study child was classified as having a fracture or not on the basis of a radiologist’s interpretation of the patient’s radiographs.The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the POCUS evaluation by the ED physician (fracture or no fracture) when compared to radiograph interpretation. Secondary outcomes included (a) patient self-reported pain immediately after radiography and POCUS by using Faces Pain Scale–Revised scores, (b) caregiver satisfaction with each imaging procedure by using a single-item question and a 5-point Likert scale, and (c) duration of POCUS and radiography procedures.Of 169 children enrolled, 76 had a fracture on radiographs. The most common type was a buckle fracture (80%). The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS were 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.7%–99.8%) and 93.5% (95% CI, 88.6%–98.5%), respectively. There were 4 fractures missed with POCUS (1 distal radius buckle fracture and 3 ulnar styloid factures). There were 6 nonfractures that were interpreted as fractures at POCUS.POCUS was associated with a significantly lower median pain score when compared with radiography. There was no significant difference in median caregiver satisfaction scores with POCUS and radiographic procedures. POCUS was associated with a significantly lower median procedure duration than radiography (1.5 vs 27 minutes, respectively; P < .001).The researchers conclude that using POCUS to assess distal forearm injuries in children is accurate, timely, and associated with low levels of pain.Dr Stevenson has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.POCUS is a useful tool in the pediatric ED setting. The current study is 1 of several published in recent years to evaluate its use in forearm fractures in children. A recent meta-analysis of these studies supports the high sensitivity and specificity reported in the present study,1 which excluded children with obvious forearm deformities and thereby reduced the potential for inflated test performance.Few prior studies have been conducted to evaluate pain as an outcome.2 In the present study, most patients received nonopioid analgesia, and POCUS was often performed after radiography, perhaps influencing the lower pain scores reported with POCUS owing to the longer duration since medication administration. Regardless, the median pain score with POCUS was impressively low.While this technology is fast and easy to use, further study is needed to determine what level of training is required by ED physicians to reproduce these test characteristics. POCUS in this study was performed by 1 of 4 ED physicians who had been certified by the Canadian Emergency Ultrasound Society, underwent training, and had at least 2 years of experience with POCUS. In addition, the authors of both the present study and the recent meta-analysis propose future noninferiority trials to demonstrate that POCUS is no worse than radiography for such outcomes as diagnostic accuracy and complications.1POCUS performed by trained physicians in the ED setting can rapidly and accurately be used to diagnose nonangulated forearm fractures in children. Additional benefits include lack of radiation and minimal discomfort for children.We have previously highlighted the benefits of bedside US performed by pediatricians (see AAP Grand Rounds, 2013;29[4]:37).3 The list of conditions that may be safely and accurately diagnosed with this modality continues to expand, from appendicitis to pneumonia and pleural effusion (see page 16 this issue), and now, as suggested by the results of the current study, to forearm fractures in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAP Grand RoundsSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207