MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4238803057 · doi:10.2196/preprints.14119

A smartphone-based mindful breathing task with assessment of heart-rate variability for clinically relevant chronic pain, depression, and anxiety: Protocol for a randomized-controlled trial (Preprint)

2019· preprint· en· W4238803057 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abid Azam, Vered Latman, Joel Katz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessAnxietyMeditationMoodRandomized controlled trialBreathingPsychologyPhysical therapyHeart rate variabilityDepression (economics)Clinical psychologyHeart rateMedicinePsychiatryBlood pressureInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Mindfulness meditation is a commonly used psychological intervention for pain, mood, and anxiety conditions, but can be challenging to practice when dealing with severe symptoms without proper training experience. The Mindfulness Meditation App (MMA) is a supportive training tool specifically developed for the present study, to aid in the practice of mindful breathing using a smartphone. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study is to evaluate the psychophysiological effects of the MMA. Specifically, the study aims to assess parasympathetic functioning using heart-rate variability (HRV; primary outcome), pain and mood symptoms, mind-wandering and present awareness, and breath focus in groups of participants who self-report clinically significant symptoms of chronic pain (CP), depression and/or anxiety (DA), as well as control participants (C) who do not meet criteria for either. METHODS The present study is a two-arm randomized-controlled trial (registration #NCT03296007), taking place at York University in Toronto, Canada. Sixty participants in each group of CP, DA, or C (N=180 total) will be pre-screened and randomly assigned by a 1:1 ratio to a mindfulness meditation app (MMA+) condition or a mindfulness meditation condition without the app (MMA-) after a brief stress-induction procedure. In MMA+, participants will practice mindful breathing with a smartphone and press “breath” or “other” buttons at the sound of audio tones if their awareness was on breathing or another experience, respectively. HRV and respiration data will be obtained during rest (5 minutes), stress-induction (5 minutes), and meditation condition (12 minutes). Participants will complete psychological self-report inventories before and after the stress-induction, and after the meditation condition. RESULTS Recruitment for the study began in November 2017 and is expected to be completed in July of 2019. CONCLUSIONS This RCT will inform the design of mindfulness meditation training tools delivered by apps and web platforms for the treatment of chronic pain, depression, and anxiety conditions. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03296007

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions→French-language works237,207→