MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4238806309 · doi:10.5194/cpd-8-1-2012

The initiation of modern soft and hard Snowball Earth climates in CCSM4

2012· preprint· en· W4238806309 on OpenAlexafffund
Jianqiang Yang, W. R. Peltier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of TorontoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCompute Canada
KeywordsSnowball EarthEnvironmental scienceClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesIce-albedo feedbackGlacial periodClimate stateGreenhouse gasAlbedo (alchemy)Climate changeGlobal warmingSea iceGeologyArctic ice packOceanographyEffects of global warmingDrift ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Geochemical and geological evidence suggested that several global-scale glaciation events occurred during the Neoproterozoic era at 750–580 million years ago. The initiation of these glaciations is thought to have been a consequence of the combined influence of a result of low-level carbon dioxide and an approximately 6% weakening of solar luminosity. The latest version of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4) is employed herein to explore the detailed combination of forcings required to trigger such extreme glaciation under present-day geography and topography conditions. It is found that runaway glaciation occurs in the model under the following conditions: (1) a 8–9% reduction in solar radiation with 286 ppmv CO2 or (2) a 6% reduction in solar radiation with 70–100 ppmv CO2. These thresholds are only moderately different from those found to be characteristic of the previous CCSM3 model reported recently in Yang et al. (2011a,b) for which the respective critical points corresponded to a 10–10.5% reduction in solar radiation with 286 ppmv CO2 or a 6% reduction in solar radiation with 17.5–20 ppmv CO2. The most important reason for these differences is that the sea-ice/snow albedo in CCSM4 is somewhat higher than in CCSM3. Differences in cloud radiative forcings and oceanic and atmospheric heat transports between CCSM3 and CCSM4 also influence the bifurcation points. The forcings required to trigger a "hard Snowball" Earth in either CCSM3 or CCSM4 may be not met by the conditions expected to be characteristic of the Neoproterozoic. Furthermore, there exist "soft Snowball" Earth states, in which the sea-ice coverage reaches approximately 60–65%, land masses in low latitudes are covered by perennial snow, and runaway glaciation does not develop. This is also qualitatively consistent with our previous results of the CCSM3 model. These results suggest that a "soft Snowball" solution for the Neoproterozoic is entirely plausible and may in fact be preferred.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→