MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238813095 · doi:10.1002/ev.20357

Issue Information

2020· paratext· en· W4238813095 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Directions for Evaluation · 2020
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEvaluation and Performance Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, Los AngelesSierra Health FoundationNational Science FoundationClaremont Graduate UniversityDuquesne UniversityWeizmann Institute of ScienceMichigan State UniversityNorthwestern UniversityGordon and Betty Moore FoundationUniversity of ConnecticutCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityÉcole nationale d'administration publiqueSyracuse UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Hawai'iJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceCitationWorld Wide WebInformation retrievalLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Where the subscription price includes print issues and delivery is to the recipient'

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5580.410

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Directions for EvaluationSame topicEvaluation and Performance AssessmentFrench-language works237,207