MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238827940 · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10466

Ossature: Bone Remodeling as a Generative Structuring Process in Architecture

2014· dissertation· en· W4238827940 on OpenAlexaff
David King

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDesign Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructuringGenerative grammarProcess (computing)Articulation (sociology)ArchitectureComputer scienceExpression (computer science)Generative modelEngineeringArtificial intelligenceGeographyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an inherent and complex interrelationship between material, structure and form that exists in nature, whereby each informs the other through a dynamic process.In nature, form is not imposed; instead it emerges as an expression and articulation of dynamic material responses to environmental stresses and circumstances.I propose looking at this responsive form generation as a model for developing architectural structures.Specifically, this thesis proposes looking at bone tissue remodeling as a new generative process for structure in architecture.Bone tissue becomes highly optimized by the self-organizing and remodeling of its structure in response to loads; creating a complex structure that is both high in strength and low in weight.Its shape is directly informed by the forces acting upon and within it; material and structure are distributed along stress paths three dimensionally.The objective of this research will be to examine the feasibility of utilizing bone remodeling algorithms as a generative design tool in the development of structures in architecture.iii Definitions Algorithm -A sequence or procedure for calculation Additive Manufacturing (AM) -The process of making a three-dimensional object by successively adding layers of material Anisotropy -The property of being directionally dependent Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) -Based on FEM, iteratively adds or removes material from a structure Computer-Aided Optimization (CAO) -Based on FEM, this method thickens highly stress areas of a structure much like a tree Computer Aided Internal Optimization (CAIO) -Based on FEM, optimizes fiber orientation within an object Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO) -Based on FEM, iteratively removes unused material from a structure Finite Element Analysis (FEA) -The application of FEM to solve engineering problems Finite Element Method (FEM) -An analysis technique used to solve a complex equation using many smaller equations Generative -Refers to a rule based system where complex behaviours emerge from the interaction of simpler elements Isotropy -Identical properties in all directions Load -a force applied to a structure causing stress, deformation or displacement Optimization -In engineering, refers to the selection of the best solution from a set for the condition of maximizing or minimizing a desired property iv Soft Kill Option (SKO) -Based on FEM, removes under-stressed material within a design boundary Strain -A measure of deformation representing displacement relative to a reference length Stress -In engineering, refers to the measurable quantity of internal forces of an object Topology -The study of surfaces, concerned with preserving spatial properties under deformation Topology Optimization -A mathematical approach that optimizes material layout within a design space for a given set of loads so that the result meets desired performance targets Von Mises Stress -A criterion used to predict yielding of materials under any loading condition Voronoi -A way of dividing space into regions where a set of points has a corresponding region consisting of all points closer to it than to any other Young's Modulus -A measure of the stiffness of an elastic material defined by the ratio of stress along an axis over strain v Acknowledgements Firstly, a thank you to my supervisor, Manuel Baez, for your insight and relentless urging to do better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDesign Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207