The implementation of a family education program by the British Columbia Schizophrenia Society.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis describes the formative, improvement-focused evaluation of the implementation of the National Alliance for the Mentally HI Familv-to-Familv education program by members of the British Columbia Schizophrenia Society.Using a case study approach, this thesis analyzes the Familv-to-Familv education program materials and archives, key informant interviews, and content of the records of the British Columbia Schizophrenia Society Regional coordinator in northwest British Columbia.The data collected was used to evaluate the implementation of the Familv-to-Familv education program.From the analysis, actions were recommended to improve the implementation of the program as follows:• to clearly state the goals, philosophy, and outcomes of the Familv-to-Familv education program in the introductory chapter of the program • to develop more strategies for educators working in remote areas• to use the profile developed in this thesis for the recruitment of volunteer family educators • to use the recommended Implementation Fidelity Index developed in this thesis • to use the recommended Augmentation Index developed in this thesis • to thoroughly plan the implementation of all new programs • to use the Checklist for Program Approval for the British Columbia Schizophrenia Society Board of Directors and staff, developed in this thesis • to ensure that the Familv-to-Familv education program be funded as a core program by the Northwest Community Services Society • to develop a "made in Canada" family education program • to explore the needs of family members of First Nations ancestry• to create a professional milieu of acceptance of appropriate family involvement in the lives of individuals with a mental illness by incorporating family involvement into the job descriptions of community and hospital based mental health employees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".