MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238859843 · doi:10.1017/s0075435800002082

N. M. Horsfall, Virgil, Aeneid 7. A Commentary (Mnemosyne Suppl. 198). Leiden: Brill, 2000. Pp. xliv + 566. ISBN 9-00410-842-4. €207.00. - N. M. Horsfall, Virgil, Aeneid 11. A Commentary (Mnemosyne Suppl. 244). Leiden: Brill, 2003. Pp. xxvii + 505. ISBN 9-00412-934-0. €130.00. - N. M. Horsfall, Virgil, Aeneid 3. A Commentary (Mnemosyne Suppl. 273). Leiden: Brill, 2006. Pp. liv + 513. ISBN 9-00414-828-0. €165.00.

2008· article· es· W4238859843 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Roman Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrillClassicsPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

N. M. Horsfall, Virgil, Aeneid 7. A Commentary (Mnemosyne Suppl. 198). Leiden: Brill, 2000. Pp. xliv + 566. ISBN 9-00410-842-4. €207.00. - N. M. Horsfall, Virgil, Aeneid 11. A Commentary (Mnemosyne Suppl. 244). Leiden: Brill, 2003. Pp. xxvii + 505. ISBN 9-00412-934-0. €130.00. - N. M. Horsfall, Virgil, Aeneid 3. A Commentary (Mnemosyne Suppl. 273). Leiden: Brill, 2006. Pp. liv + 513. ISBN 9-00414-828-0. €165.00. - Volume 98

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0110.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.010
Science and technology studies0.0210.020
Scholarly communication0.0030.010
Open science0.0150.015
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it