MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238869356 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v36i00a04

Updated Statement on the use of Rotavirus Vaccines

2010· article· en· W4238869356 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsStatement (logic)RotavirusVirologyRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus vaccineMedicinePolitical scienceVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vaccine in CCDR in January 2008 Additional epidemiologic, safety and effectiveness information relevant to the use of rotavirus vaccines has also become available. While the two authorized vaccines (RotaTeq, Merck Canada, Inc. and Rotarix TM ) both protect against rotavirus gastroenteritis, they differ in their composition and scheduled usage. This statement provides an update on the recommendations for use of pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq) and provides information on the safety, efficacy, and recommended use of live, attenuated monovalent human rotavirus vaccine (Rotarix TM ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207