MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238869693 · doi:10.1093/jcs/csaa065

Notes on Church-State Affairs

2020· article· en· W4238869693 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David W Hendon, Scott T Prather, Jacob R Randolph

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Church and State · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOfficerHajjConstitutionState (computer science)LawPolitical sciencePublic administrationGovernment (linguistics)Economic JusticeSociologyIslamHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A police officer, Edgar Karapetyan, won an important employment case in the Administrative Court of Armenia. The second lieutenant was fired because of his membership in an evangelical church. Freedom of religion is guaranteed in the Constitution of Armenia, but minority religions often face difficulty in registering and are targeted as “cults.” Bahrain commended Saudi Arabia’s effort to protect pilgrims during the downsized hajj. The Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom announced a challenge to the government of Ontario on behalf of several members of the Orthodox Jewish community in Toronto. Under strict rules in place for thousands of years, the Orthodox must pray three times a day in a group of at least ten men. Ontario’s Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, however, banned gatherings of more than five people—including religious groups. The city of Calgary in Alberta passed a new measure barring counseling services that provide conversion services for people with same-sex attraction. The measure passed in a 14–1 vote. Penalties could include a year in prison or a $10,000 fine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0160.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Church and StateSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207