Bibliographic record
Abstract
Que ce soit par des politiques, des lignes directrices ou des recommandations, les organisations nationales et internationales de la santé déploient des efforts afin de promouvoir, soutenir et protéger l'allaitement.Par ces moyens, elles cherchent à instaurer une culture d'allaitement forte et à faire de l'allaitement une norme nutritionnelle infantile tant à l'échelle nationale qu'internationale.Bien que l'allaitement soit bénéfique pour la santé des mères et celle de leurs enfants, un regard critique, teinté par la théorie queer, et plus particulièrement par les écrits de Judith Butler et de Michel Foucault, nous permet de prendre conscience des effets potentiellement insidieux de la promotion de l'allaitement sur la construction de l'identité maternelle.La sédimentation des normes du genre féminin en contexte de maternité, la fabrication de phénomènes sociaux tels que la « bonne mère » ainsi que la définition de l'identité maternelle à partir d'idéaux socioculturels sont les possibles effets pernicieux de la promotion de l'allaitement maternel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".