MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238911105 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2014.0225

35e Festival International de Films de Femmes

2014· article· en· W4238911105 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruth A. Hottell

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesbianFilm directorArt historyMovie theaterDocumentary filmBallroomSociologyHumanitiesArtGender studiesMedia studiesPerformance art

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Film edited by Michèle Bissière 35e Festival International de Films de Femmes, Créteil, 22–31 mars 2013. . The FIFF continues to increase in quality on the pedagogical side that sets it apart from most film festivals, bringing in classes from local junior high and high schools, and continuing the jury composed of high school students, La graine de cinéphage. One of the highlights remains the daily newsletter and video, entirely shot and produced by high school students. Similarly, the pre-release showings and “master classes” remain strong contributions to the festival. The Master Classes afford the opportunity to participate in small group discussions with the filmmaker. The sections in 2013 included Les pionnières du cinéma, honoring the memory of women filmmakers from the first fifty years of the cinema: Alice Guy, Loïs Weber, Frances Marion, Dorothy Arzner, Germaine Dulac, Lotte Reiniger. Another section, Homoparentalité, featured Marie Mandy. This year, she showed her own Nos parents sont gays et c’est pas triste (2003) and J’ai deux mamans by Christine François (2003). Mandy’s film was the first French-speaking documentary to engage the children of lesbian parents,to seek out their opinions and life experiences. J’ai deux mamans sheds light on the legal consequences for the mother who is not the biological parent. Raising their children before the PACS or same-gender marriage law, Marie-Laure had to renounce claims to her children so that Carla could adopt them, then re-file for maternity rights. A series of interviews, especially with the two women, the film is a powerful answer to those who ask why marriage is necessary, especially given the rights accorded by the PACS. Another master class, La liberté de voir, with Québécois filmmaker Helen Doyle, brought another point of view to the European audience. Discussing the lack of support for Québécois films within the Canadian context and even more so for women, she decried the lack of a film school in Québec when she started. Truly a self-taught filmmaker, she reiterated the forbidden subjects for film at the beginning of her thirtyfive -year career: female sexuality, menopause, rape. At the end of the session, the director of FIFF underscored an ongoing primordial strength of festivals—the remarks just heard from Helen Doyle are not written anywhere. Therein lies another critical element of attending film festivals, of chronicling the rich array of showings and activities. The two roundtable sections had particular resonance for the connections between cinema and cultural movements,including political and socio-economic upheavals.One category, L’Europe extrême, a panorama of twenty-five contemporary films, exposed the precarious situation in post-communist Eastern Europe.The second topic,Nouvelles formes du féminisme, followed uncannily the press surrounding the feminist group 190 FRENCH REVIEW 87.4 Reviews 191 Femen. Since the festival was sandwiched between the group’s demonstration against the Pope in Notre-Dame and the one outside the Paris Mosque, the screening of the 2012 documentary Nos seins, nos armes (Nadia El Fani and Caroline Fourest) and the ensuing discussion presaged the coming front page coverage (see Libération from 6 June, among others). Originally from the Ukraine, and beginning their resistance movement against the patriarchy, dictators, and obscurantist religions there, the group is now headquartered in Paris, where they train new members and plan protests. Several members of Femen, their heads adorned with the trademark crown of flowers, fielded questions from the floor, many of which questioned their motives in baring their breasts since they are almost all young and beautiful. Whatever one’s opinion of the movement may be, the film is eloquent, tracing their beginnings, their early and ongoing struggles and targets as well as their training and planning sessions. Coupled with Nos seins was another documentary of a more personal nature. Même pas mal (Nadia El Fani and Alina Isabel Pérez, 2012) follows El Fani’s double combat against Islamists and against her cancer. The Franco-Tunisian artist’s film treats freedom of expression and the artistic, creative, and political struggles made ever more necessary due to continuing obscurantist tendencies. The...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207