MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238930906 · doi:10.33423/jlae.v16i5.2659

Bringing Mindfulness Practice to Leadership and Business Education

2019· article· en· W4238930906 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Leadership Accountability and Ethics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessPsychologyCurriculumMedical educationPedagogyApplied psychologyPsychotherapistMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mindfulness is a learned skill developed through individual practice. Evidence on the positive outcomes associated with mindfulness has resulted in organizations adopting mindfulness programs. Leadership and business educators have sought to cultivate mindfulness in the classroom to promote learning and increase learners’ awareness of their own and others’ perspectives. In an attempt to enhance students’ mindfulness and to draw connections between mindfulness and individual and organizational effectiveness, the authors incorporated a series of mindfulness exercises into their classes. While developed for undergraduate and graduate courses in leadership, the exercises would also be appropriate in other courses in the business curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Leadership Accountability and EthicsSame topicJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorFrench-language works237,207