MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4238961105 · doi:10.3410/f.738599006.793579999

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Biosynthesis of medicinal tropane alkaloids in yeast.

2020· dataset· en· W4238961105 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kazuki Saito, Tsubasa Shoji

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHyoscyamineYeastTropaneHeterologous expressionBiologyVacuoleBiochemistryBiosynthesisGenomeComputational biologyBiotechnologyEnzymeGeneRecombinant DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tropane alkaloids (TAs) from nightshade plants are neurotransmitter inhibitors used for treating neuromuscular disorders and are classified as essential medicines by the World Health Organization 1,2 .Global supply challenges have resulted in frequent drug shortages 3,4 .Further supply-chain vulnerabilities are revealed by events like the Australian wildfires 5 and the COVID-19 pandemic 6 .Rapidly deployable production strategies that are robust to environmental and socioeconomic upheaval 7,8 are needed.Here, we engineered baker's yeast to produce the medicinal TAs hyoscyamine and scopolamine starting from simple sugars and amino acids.We combined functional genomics to identify a missing pathway enzyme, protein engineering to enable functional acyltransferase expression via trafficking to the vacuole, heterologous transporters to facilitate intracellular routing, and strain optimization to improve titers.Our integrated system positions >20 proteins adapted from yeast, bacteria, plants, and animals across six sub-cellular locations to recapitulate the spatial organization of TA biosynthesis in plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0850.102

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature→Same topicPlant tissue culture and regeneration→French-language works237,207→