MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238977591 · doi:10.1017/9781782046981.008

Apogee and Royal Retreat: From the Duke of Wellington to Prince Albert Victor and William Gladstone (1852–1892/8)

2016· other· en· W4238977591 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthias Range

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleHEROTheme (computing)State (computer science)HistoryArt historyPerformance artArtPeriod (music)ClassicsAncient historyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theme of ‘Public Heroes and Private Royals’ would apply to the whole of the nineteenth century. All the same, one could still see a subtle subdivision in the mid-century. Christine Quigley summarised that Nelson's state funeral in 1806 had ‘set the stage for those that followed’. While this did not quite apply immediately to Pitt the Younger's funeral in the same year, nor to any of the following royal funerals, Nelson's precedent was very much followed at the next state funeral of a great national hero: that of the famous victor of the battle of Waterloo, the Duke of Wellington. As Cannadine has summarised, Wellington's funeral was ‘on a scale of grandeur and magnificence which was never attained before and has never been equalled since’. Besides the traditional, grand heraldic funerals of the early modern period, Wellington's obsequies were the apogee of the grand funeral ritual. At the same time, the royal funerals in the second half of the century were comparatively obscure occasions. They continued to take place in Windsor and retreated more into the private sphere than those earlier in the century. Duke of Wellington, 1852 The Duke of Wellington died on 14 September 1852 and the funeral took place over two months later, on 18 November. His death and funeral have been the focus of much research and this has become the probably best-researched and most often discussed funeral of the past four hundred years. All the same, the ceremonial and music have not yet been considered in detail. Like Nelson, Wellington was buried in St Paul's Cathedral. Wolffe concludes that this choice was ‘crucial’ in confirming the Cathedral's position as ‘the preeminent shrine for the nation's naval and military heroes’. Indeed, in a published sermon on the funeral, Thomas Jackson, a prebendary of St Paul’s, declared the Cathedral to be ‘England's central sanctuary’, and the Illustrated London News went so far as to hail it as ‘the grandest mausoleum in Christendom’. However, Wolffe has also shown that the choice of St Paul's was no foregone conclusion, Westminster Abbey also having been suggested. The Cathedral was eventually chosen by Queen Victoria together with her husband Prince Albert and the prime minister, following the precedent of Nelson's funeral. The queen herself did not personally attend the service but Prince Albert did, together with other members of the royal family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.010
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207