Bibliographic record
Abstract
“We need to know about here, because here is where we live,” wrote Margaret Atwood in her landmark literary manifesto, Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature (1972b, 19). Atwood has contributed to that literature in myriad ways, becoming the twentieth century's most celebrated and well‐known Canadian writer. It is not an exaggeration to say that Atwood put Canada on the literary map. She was a central voice in the late 1960s and early 1970s, promoting the importance of Canadian national identity against the cultural inferiority complex that had come to dominate Canadian society, particularly in relation to the United States. Survival became something of a rallying cry to writers and readers of that generation. However, it is not only the politics of Canadian nationalism that has informed Atwood's writing. She has taken on many of the political and social issues of her time, including women's equality, violence against women, totalitarianism, religious fundamentalism, environmentalism, genetic modification, American cultural imperialism, consumerism, freedom of speech, authors' rights, Amnesty International, and many more. Atwood is an enviably multitalented writer and thinker: a poet, novelist, short story writer, literary critic, editor, satirist, children's author, painter and illustrator, cultural commentator, and mentor to numerous Canadian writers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".