Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter explores citizens' engagement in politics. Indeed, politics was the single largest preoccupation of the male autobiographers: more than one-quarter of the male writers reported having been involved in some form of political movement or organisation. The movements they joined were almost exclusively on the left of the political spectrum and as such they promoted not only social mobility for the specific individuals who joined them but also the collective interests of working people as a whole. They were thus part of a larger transition that occurred between the 1860s and 1930s, which saw the wrangling of political power out of the hands of the social elites who had traditionally claimed it as their special prerogative. This marked a permanent break from the old regime with working men both claiming and starting to exercise a right to participate in the nation's political machinery. But though this development involved a shift in the balance of power between social classes, like all elements of Britain's cultural and economic life during this period, this transition was gendered in nature. Power was tilting towards working-class men, but working-class women remained firmly on the fringes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".