MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Self‐Injury

2015· other· en· W4239052406 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah E. Victor, E. David Klonsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMoodPsychopathologySelf-destructive behaviorAnxietyPunishment (psychology)SelfClinical psychologyInjury preventionPsychotherapistPoison controlPsychiatryMedicineSocial psychologyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nonsuicidal self‐injury is the deliberate self‐inflicted destruction of one's own body tissue without suicidal intent and for purposes not socially sanctioned. Common examples include self‐cutting, burning, and hitting. Self‐injury is especially common among adolescents and is associated with varied types of psychopathology, including mood and anxiety disorders and suicide attempts. Most people who frequently self‐injure begin in adolescence and stop in young adulthood, although the majority of those who try self‐injury engage in the behavior just once or a few times. People engage in self‐injury for a variety of reasons; the most commonly reported are reduction of negative emotional experiences and self‐punishment. Some people also engage in self‐injury to communicate with or influence others. Psychotherapies emphasizing emotional regulation, problem solving, and functional assessment appear to be most effective for treating self‐injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Clinical PsychologySame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207