MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Battle of<scp>M</scp>aldon, The

2017· other· en· W4239058053 on OpenAlexaff
Gernot Wieland

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in Britain · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattlePoetryInterpretation (philosophy)HEROLiteratureHistoryArtSet (abstract data type)PhilosophyAncient historyComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 325‐line Old English poem which is usually referred to asThe Battle of Maldoncannot be interpreted easily. The date of the poem, the role its author played at the battle, its relationship to other historical events of the time as well as to other accounts of the battle, its characterization of the Danes, its portrayal of the hero and his men, all harbor some ambiguities and prevent easy interpretation. It may be safe to say that the poet meant to set a worthy monument for Byrhtnoth's bravery, which he does by invoking the ideals of thecomitatussociety, and that he intended to portray him as a pious man. Beyond that most questions must remain open.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in BritainSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207