Communication interculturelle et internationale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce deuxième volume sur la communication interculturelle et internationale (CII) poursuit le développement du champ de la CII amorcé dans le volume 1 et présente de nouveaux travaux théoriques et résultats de recherche qui y sont ancrés. Il enrichit le développement du champ en mettant en valeur la riche recherche francophone dans ce domaine. Les articles réunis dans ce numéro proposent plus spécifiquement des réflexions sur les thèmes de la communication médiatique et diasporique sur le continent africain et sur le thème des rencontres, des relations et des échanges interculturels (à l’international et au Québec). This second publication on Intercultural and International Communication (CII) further develops the theoretical work and research results of this field, initiated in the first issue. This special issue of Communiquer – the second of two – broadens the CII field by highlighting the rich French-speaking research contribution. More specifically, the articles here presented offer reflections on the themes of media and diasporic communication on the African continent, but also on the theme of encounters, relationships and intercultural exchanges (internationally and in Quebec).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".