Communication interculturelle et internationale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce deuxième volume sur la communication interculturelle et internationale (CII) poursuit le développement du champ de la CII amorcé dans le volume 1 et présente de nouveaux travaux théoriques et résultats de recherche qui y sont ancrés. Il enrichit le développement du champ en mettant en valeur la riche recherche francophone dans ce domaine. Les articles réunis dans ce numéro proposent plus spécifiquement des réflexions sur les thèmes de la communication médiatique et diasporique sur le continent africain et sur le thème des rencontres, des relations et des échanges interculturels (à l’international et au Québec). This second publication on Intercultural and International Communication (CII) further develops the theoretical work and research results of this field, initiated in the first issue. This special issue of Communiquer – the second of two – broadens the CII field by highlighting the rich French-speaking research contribution. More specifically, the articles here presented offer reflections on the themes of media and diasporic communication on the African continent, but also on the theme of encounters, relationships and intercultural exchanges (internationally and in Quebec).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".