MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239083486 · doi:10.7202/1085032ar

L’Oedipe africain à travers une lecturedes dessins d’une enfant sénégalaise

2012· article· fr· W4239083486 on OpenAlex
Prudence Bessette, Véronique Dufour, Irène Krymko-Bleton, Serge Lesourd

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches qualitatives · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente l’analyse qualitative du Test des quatre dessins, composé d’épreuves projectives de dessins (libre, du bonhomme, de famille et de famille rêvée) d’une enfant sénégalaise de 11 ans selon le protocole de la recherche internationale CoPsyEnfant sur la construction de l’identité en fonction du lien social. L’analyse vise à étudier les identifications et la dynamique oedipienne et à interroger la présence d’éléments relatifs à une théorie de l’Oedipe africain (Ortigues & Ortigues, 1984). L’analyse faite selon les principes de cohérence interne, de convergence et de saturation révèle l’identification au collectif par l’intermédiaire de l’image du drapeau national et l’identification au féminin. On peut aussi supposer une construction classique de la structure oedipienne chez la jeune fille avec des éléments d’identification occidentaux qui questionnent l’influence de la mondialisation sur les enfants africains. L’investissement d’un phallus collectif semble actif dans la construction de l’identité, ce qui marquerait une spécificité culturelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.289
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it