Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lam.pro.pe'di.a. Gr. adj. lampros bright, radiant; Gr. n. pedia a plain, flat country; M.L. fem. n. Lampropedia a shining flat sheet (of cells). Sheets of rounded, almost cubical cells, arranged in square tablets of 16–64 cells , occasionally separated into pairs or tetrads. Divide synchronously in a sheet and alternately in two planes . The cells of a tablet are enclosed within a complex, structured envelope . Each cell is enclosed in a Gram‐negative type of cell wall . Intracellular granules of poly ‐β‐ hydroxybutyrate are prominent. No flagella occur. Twitching movements of small groups of cells occur during active growth. Obligately aerobic , having a strictly respiratory type of metabolism with oxygen serving as the terminal electron acceptor. Growth occurs as a thin, hydrophobic, extending pellicle on the surface of both liquid and solid media. Nonpigmented. Optimal temperature, 30°C. Optimal pH, 7.0. Oxidase and catalase positive. Chemoorganotrophic. Energy sources are limited to intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid cycle . Carbohydrates, alcohols, glucosides, and fatty acids are not utilized. Ammonium salts or certain amino acids can serve as sole nitrogen sources. Vitamins may be required for growth . The ecological niche is unknown but observations and isolations indicate an environment rich in organic matter. The mol % G + C of the DNA is : 61 (Bd). Type species : Lampropedia hyalina (Ehrenberg 1832) Schroeter 1886, 151 ( Gonium hyalinum Ehrenberg 1832, 63.) Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the genus Lampropedia is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Pseudomonadati / Pseudomonadota / Betaproteobacteria / Burkholderiales / Comamonadaceae / Lampropedia The genus Lampropedia can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as g__Lampropedia (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Pseudomonadota / c__Gammaproteobacteria / o__Burkholderiales / f__Burkholderiaceae / g__Lampropedia * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.453 | 0.316 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".