MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239192266 · doi:10.1002/9781119274780.ch49

Rio Tinto AP44 Cell Technology Development at Alma Smelter

2016· other· en· W4239192266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBauxite Residue and Utilization
Canadian institutionsRio Tinto (Canada)
FundersForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
KeywordsMilestoneSmeltingTechnology developmentAluminium smeltingEngineeringGeographyMetallurgyArchaeologyManufacturing engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AP30 platform reached an important milestone at the Alma Smelter. This latter is the first to operate above 400 kA. Following this success, Rio Tinto Aluminium group launched the AP44 cell development to offer a technology capable of operating above 440 kA. This represents fifty percent more than the original AP30 cell. The technology is expected to deliver world-class performance such as metal production of 3274 kg/day/cell and an energy consumption of approximately 13.23 kWh/kg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBauxite Residue and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207