Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract HOW TO WRITE ABOUT CONTEMPORARY ART, GILDA WILLIAMS London: Thames and Hudson (2014), 264 pp., Paperback, ISBN: 978-0-50029-157-3, £12.95 CAPITAL CULTURE: J. CARTER BROWN, THE NATIONAL GALLERY, AND THE REINVENTION OF THE MUSEUM EXPERIENCE, NEIL HARRIS Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press (2013), 616 pp., Hardcover, ISBN: 978-0-22606-770-4, US$35.00 INSTITUTIONS BY ARTISTS: VOLUME ONE, JEFF KHONSARY AND KRISTINA LEE PODESVA (EDS) Vancouver: Fillip Editions and Pacific Association of Artist Run Centres (2012), 384 pp., Paperback, ISBN: 978-1-92735-402-5, CAN$20.00 YOU ARE HERE: ART AFTER THE INTERNET, OMAR KHOLEIF (ED.) Manchester and London: Cornerhouse and SPACE (2014), 256 pp., ISBN: 978-0-95695-717-7, Paperback, £15.95
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.569 | 0.535 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".