Fuzzy Similarity Measure and its Application to High Resolution Colour Remote Sensing Image Processing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The focus for the study in this thesis is placed on developing basic algorithms and tools for high-resolution colour remote sensing image processing tasks such as colour morphology, multivariate clustering, and multivariate filtering. First, the fuzzy similarity measure (FSM) among vectors in a vector space is introduced. This measure is based on two assumptions for the relationship among vectors: short-range ordering and fuzzification. Second, based on the FSM, the colour morphology, multivariate fuzzy clustering, and multivariate filtering are defined. The performances of all proposed methods will be evaluated numerically and subjectively. Third, this study also places more emphases on solving some applied problems related to recognizing colour edges, detecting and extracting complex road network and building rooftops, and reducing noise in high-resolution remote sensing images such as QuickBird, Ikonos, and aerial images. The results obtained in the study demonstrate the effectiveness and efficacy of the FMS and the proposed methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it