Separation of a phenol carboxylating organism from a two-member, strict anaerobic co-culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a culture converting phenol to benzoic acid under anaerobic conditions and previously described as being constituted of only a Clostridium-like strain 6, another bacterium (strain 7) was observed. Each organism was enriched by centrifugation on a Percoll gradient. Strain 6 was purified by dilution and plating. Strain 7 did not grow on solid media, but a strain 7 culture, cleared of strain 6, was obtained by subculturing in the presence of ampicillin and by dilution. In fresh medium, phenol was transformed by the reconstituted co-culture but not by each strain alone. In a supernatant from a co-culture or from a strain 6 culture, strain 7 alone transformed phenol but not strain 6. Maintenance of an active strain 7 in fresh medium instead of co-culture supernatant became possible when phenol was replaced by 4-hydroxybenzoate (4-OHB), which is decarboxylated to phenol before being transformed to benzoate. Even with 4-OHB, the use of co-culture (or strain 6 culture) supernatant resulted in faster transformation activity and growth rate. A phylogenetic analysis placed strain 7 in a cluster of uncultivated or nonisolated bacteria (9296% homology). Strain 7 is also related to Desulfotomaculum, Desulfitobacterium, Desulfosporosinus, Moorella, and Sporotomaculum genera (8792% homology).Key words: co-culture, carboxylation, decarboxylation, anaerobic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".