Treacherous Murder: Language and Meaning in French Murder Trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNDER COVER OF DARKNESS in 1262, an escaped prisoner snuck into the town of Montdidier, France, knocked at the first door he came to and when a woman answered, he struck her with a knife. In 1290, Judoco Reston was arrested in the town of Roye in northern France on suspicion of murder and acting treacherously. In 1312, the abbot of Saint-Nicolas-sous-Ribemont hired assassins who waylaid the clerk Robert de Suzanne as he headed for an appearance at court against the abbot, mortally wounding him. In 1320, Robin de La Fontaine brutally attacked a valet of the king, cutting off his nose before killing him. This is a small sample of the murder cases heard by the Parlement of Paris from 1254 to 1320. The diversity of victims and perpetrators displays a range of motives, and the cases also feature multiple times and locations – during the day, at night, in the home, on the public road – with an even greater variety to be had within the full set of 667 extant wrongful death cases tried in this sixty- seven-year period. The variety was such that the records show little by way of a pattern with regard to murder in late thirteenth- to early fourteenth-century France, though studies of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries tend to evince clear trends and patterns, especially those focused on specific towns and smallscale localities. Although the records of the Parlement of Paris from 1254 to 1320 (inclusive) chiefly record incidents in northern France, the reach of royal jurisdiction was gradually expanding due to successful royal claims on non- domain territories, the development of an organised and increasingly autonomous court system, and the piecemeal negotiation of royal rights versus local privileges in lands beyond the Ile-de-France. Cases from Gascony and Languedoc are not uncommon, increasing the diversity of material in the court's records. Moreover, historical studies that focus on a single region rarely have to contend with a judicial system in flux, yet, in the second decade of the fourteenth century, Parlement not only extended its reach but also began operating independently from the king. The Capetian rulers had established an administrative network of baillis and seneschals that encouraged a governing and fiscal structure with Paris at the centre, though, in reality, France retained many centrifugal forces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".