MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MiR-137 Contributes to Drug Susceptibility and Chromosomal Instability of Multiple Myeloma through Targeting AURKA

2014· article· en· W4239274327 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Qin, Fei Li, Xiaoqi Qin, Gang An, Mu Hao, Meirong Zang, Yan Xu, Wen Zhou, Hong Chang, Lugui Qiu

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBisulfite sequencingCpG siteCancer researchDNA methylationmicroRNAMolecular biologyBiologyMethylationClonogenic assayEpigeneticsPathogenesisIn vivoGene expressionImmunologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: MicroRNAs are non-coding small RNAs that modulate protein expression and implicated in the pathogenesis of much kind of cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM). Previous study revealed that mic-137 was significant down regulated in MM patients compared with health donors. The purpose of this study is to investigate how miR-137 involved in pathogenesis and drug resistance in MM and its potential as prognostic biomarker. Materials and Methods: Real-time RT-PCR was performed to identify the expression of miR-137 in 6 MM cell lines and CD138+ cell sorted from 21 MM patients and 10 healthy donors. The methylation status of miR-137 CpG island was determined by bisulfite pyrosequencing, methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP)and bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP). The functional roles of miR-137 in MM were characterized by CCK-8 assay, soft agar clonogenic- formation, standard apoptosis assay and CGH array (CytoScan"HD Array, Affymetrix). Effect of miR-137 on MM progression in vivo was assessed in the NOD/SCID mice models. In addition, to further identify miR-137 targets, we used bioinformatics analysis and confirmed by luciferase reporter assay. In addition, a total of 19 paired sequential samples with GEP and clinical data, obtained from published studies, were analyzed. Results: The expression of miR-137 was down regulated in all 6 MM cell lines and MM patients (p=0.0017). Further study revealed that methylation of the miR-137 CpG islands was frequently observed in MM cell lines (p<0.0001) and patients (p=0.004) compared with healthy donor by MSP and BSP. Functional study of Cck-8 assay, soft agar clonogenic assay and standard apoptosis assay showed miR-137-OE NCI-H929 significantly inhibited cell proliferation and increased cell drug sensitivity compared with NCI-H929-EV in vitro. Meanwhile, the tumorigenicity of miR-137 overexpressed NCI-H929 reduces tumor volume in xenograft models at day 20 and prolonged the survival of NOD-SCID mice following tail vein injection of miR-137-OE NCI-H929 compared with control (p=0.0198). Overexpression of miR-137 inactivates both AKT and MAPK/ERK Signaling pathway by up-regulating p53 and down-regulating pAKT. Interestingly, CGH-array analysis indicated miR-137 overexpression could decrease chromosomal instability in NCI-H929, such as gain at 1q21, loss at 12p13.31 and 14q22.2 etc. To explore the mechanism of miR-137 involved in chromosome instability, our results demonstrated miR-137 mainly through up regulated AURKA expression and luciferase assay confirmed miR-137 targeted at position 374-380 of AURKA 3’UTR. Conclusion: Our data suggested that miR-137 was epigenetic silenced and targeted AURKA expression to contribute to drug susceptibility and chromosomal Instability in MM. Future studies will be performed on how miR-137 targets AURKA linked to the p53 pathway and evaluating miR-137 as prognostic biomarkers and targets for treatment in MM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207