Bibliographic record
Abstract
GUNHILD BORGGREEN and RUNE GADE, eds., Performing Archives / Archives of Performance, reviewed by David Pellegrini PENNY FARFAN and LESLEY FERRIS, eds., Contemporary Women Playwrights into the Twenty-First Century, reviewed by Lisa M. Anderson KAREN JÜRS-MUNBY, JEROME CARROLL, and STEVE GILES, eds. Postdramatic Theatre and the Political: International Perspectives on Contemporary Performance, reviewed by Julia Jarcho CAOIMHE MCAVINCHEY, ed., Performance and Community: Commentary and Case Studies, reviewed by Claire Syler CHRISTINA S. MCMAHON, Recasting Transnationalism through Performance: Theatre Festivals in Cape Verde, Mozambique, and Brazil, reviewed by Sarah J. Townsend CHRIS MORASH and SHAUN RICHARDS, Mapping Irish Theatre: Theories of Space and Place, reviewed by Lisa Fitzgerald ANDREA MOST, Theatrical Liberalism: Jews and Popular Entertainment in America, reviewed by Harley Erdman CRAIG R. PRENTISS, Staging Faith: Religion and African American Theater from the Harlem Renaissance to World War II, reviewed by Paige A. McGinley
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.380 | 0.339 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".