Energy Efficient Design and Energy Sharing Potential of Urban-Community
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a simulation study of an urban centric retail-residential complex and explores energy efficient building design parameters and energy sharing strategies within both building types of the complex. The results show that with an integrated building design approach, cutting edge technologies and high energy efficiency measures a net reduction of 29 % energy in the retail, 32 % for row house and 41 % for the detached house model is achieved compared to design complying with the minimum requirement of the applicable energy code. By adding building integrated solar photovoltaic (BIPV) system, a net reduction of 86 % in electrical energy import to the retail, 100 % for row house and 96 % for the detached house model is achieved. Additionally by sharing waste heat recovered from retail refrigeration compressor racks, up to 68% of the space and ventilation heating demand of the retailresidential complex can be met. It has been found that by feasible combination of buildings designed to harness on-site energy and sharing energy between the individual buildings, dependence on utility grids can be reduced for climate change resilient urban infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".