ANÁLISE DO DESEMPENHO FUNCIONAL E PERFIL SÓCIODEMOGRÁFICO DE UMA POPULAÇÃO COM QUEIXA DE LOMBALGIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo foi avaliar o desempenho funcional e caracterização de indivíduos com queixas de lombalgia de um grupo de exercícios terapêuticos de uma Estratégia de Saúde da Família (ESF). Foi realizado estudo transversal descritivo com 17 indivíduos, de idade média de 59 anos de ambos os sexos. O desempenho funcional foi avaliado pelo Questionário Roland Morris (RM) e a caracterização dos participantes foram a partir da coleta de dados sociodemográficos, antropométricos, localização da dor lombar, intensidade da dor pela Escala Visual Analógica (EVA). No perfil sociodemográfico a renda média foi de 1,64 salário. O índice de massa corporal variou de 22,39 a 38,91 Kg/m2. O escore do RM variou de 9 a 24 pontos de incapacidade funcional. Os resultados da EVA demonstraram que 41,2% dos indivíduos caracterizaram a dor lombar como intensa. Conclui-se que o comprometimento funcional dos indivíduos avaliados foi grave, causado pela presença de dores na coluna, principalmente, na região lombar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".