MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239314643 · doi:10.24124/2010/bpgub707

An investigation of classical Banach spaces and a synthesis of their properties.

2010· dissertation· en· W4239314643 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle Schlitt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Banach Space Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical proofAddendumBanach spaceMathematicsOrder (exchange)Computer scienceCalculus (dental)Algebra over a fieldPure mathematicsPolitical scienceLawBusinessMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A list of classical Banach spaces is examined and it is determined which spaces have each of a list of properties. Many answers, and their proofs, are found in the literature in such cases a re-written and accessible proof is supplied. Where this is not appropriate, only reference is given. All non-standard results are stated and referenced if not proved, as the exploration attempts to be as self-contained as possible. The results are summarized at the end of the document in order to maximize the usefulness of the work done and a brief discussion on additional topics is also included as an addendum. --P. ii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Banach Space TheoryFrench-language works237,207