Bibliographic record
Abstract
LEON VAN NOORDEN & DIRK MOELANTS Special Issue: Papers from the 10th Rhythm Perception and Production Workshop 123 JOHN BISPHAM Rhythm in Music: What is it? Who has it? And Why? 125 JOEL S. SNYDER, ERIN E. HANNON, EDWARD W. LARGE, & MORTEN H. CHRISTIANSEN Synchronization and Continuation Tapping to Complex Meters 135 TAKAYUKI NAKATA, SANDRA E. TREHUB, CHISATO MITANI, & YUKIHIKO KANDA Pitch and Timing in the Songs of Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants 147 MARTIN F. McKINNEY & DIRK MOELANTS Ambiguity in Tempo Perception: What Draws Listeners to Different Metrical Levels? 155 DOUGLAS ECK Identifying Metrical and Temporal Structure With an Autocorrelation Phase Matrix 167 FABIEN GOUYON, GERHARD WIDMER, XAVIER SERRA, & ARTHUR FLEXER Acoustic Cues to Beat Induction: A Machine Learning Perspective 177 GEOFF LUCK & PETRI TOIVIAINEN Ensemble Musicians’ Synchronization With Conductors’ Gestures: An Automated Feature-Extraction Analysis 189 GUY MADISON Experiencing Groove Induced by Music: Consistency and Phenomenology 201 CHRISTIANE NEUHAUS & THOMAS R. KNÖSCHE Processing of Rhythmic and Melodic Gestalts—An ERP Study 209 Music Perception (ISSN 0730-7829; online ISSN, 1533-8312) is published five times a year by University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 94720. Subscription rates per year are $75 for individuals ($42 for students/retired), $310 for institutions, and $257 for institutions (electronic), plus $20 per year for air freight delivery outside North America. Periodicals postage paid at Berkeley, CA, and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send all address changes to Music Perception, University of California Press, Journals and Digital Publishing, 2000 Center St., Suite 303, Berkeley, CA 94704-1223. Canadian GST 89626 2698 RT0001. All matters of an editorial nature should be addressed to: Lola L. Cuddy, Editor, Department of Psychology, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch St., Room 232, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6 Canada; e-mail mpercep@post.queensu.ca. Address subscription orders, changes of address, business correspondence, and advertising inquiries to Music Perception, University of California Press, Journals and Digital Publishing 2000 Center St., Suite 303, Berkeley, CA 94704-1223. e-mail journals@ucpress.edu, website www.ucpress.edu/journals. Subscription payment can be made with UNESCO book coupons. Please allow 4 months for delivery of first issue. Single copies are $15 for individuals and students and $63 for institutions. Domestic claims for nonreceipt of issues should be made within 90 days of the month of publication, overseas claims within 180 days. Thereafter, the regular back issue rate will be charged for replacement. Overseas delivery is not guaranteed. The opinions and assertions contained in Music Perception are those of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of the editor or the publisher. Copying notice: Authorization to copy article content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Regents of the University of California for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee through the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), www.copyright.com. To reach the CCC’s Customer Service Department, dial 978-750-8400 or fax them at 978-750-4470 or write to 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. Permission to distribute electronically, republish, resell, or repurpose material from 2001 forward, as well as requests for article reprints or offprints, can be fulfilled online through the CCC’s Rightslink service, available on Caliber at http://caliber.ucpress.net. All other permissions and licensing inquiries may be submitted through the University of California Press website at http://www.ucpressjournals.com Articles appearing in Music Perception are abstracted and indexed in the following select databases: Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Current Contents; E-psyche; International Index to Music Periodicals; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts; Music Index; Psychological Abstracts, RILM; PsycINFO; Abstracts of Music Literature; and Social Sciences Citation Index. For complete abstracting and indexing information, please visit http://www.ucpressjournals.com © 2006 by the Regents of the University of California. Printed in the U.S.A. This paper is acid-free and chlorine-free.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".