MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239404550 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db212983

Canadian foreign homebuyer taxes may backfire

2016· other· en· W4239404550 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal estateGovernment (linguistics)Foreign direct investmentHedgeBusinessAsset (computer security)ReputationEconomicsFinanceEconomic policyPolitical scienceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subject British Columbia's property tax for foreign homebuyers. Significance The provincial government of British Columbia introduced a 15% tax on foreign buyers of domestic property that came into effect on August 2, in an effort to lower prices in the Metro Vancouver region, with foreign investment widely perceived to be driving unaffordability. Canadian real estate has developed a reputation as a safe asset among international investors seeking to diversify their portfolios and hedge against uncertainty in the global economy. The tax is being studied by other subnational Canadian jurisdictions, such as Toronto, where local residents are priced out of overheated real estate markets. Impacts Governments in Australia, Hong Kong, New Zealand and Singapore are considering or have pursued similar levies. Tax-driven obfuscation of purchase records for real estate may have negative implications for broader global anti-corruption efforts. If the benefits of British Columbia's initiative prove to outweigh the costs, Ontario may consider such a foreign homebuyer tax.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207