MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI: O artista dos papas e o relacionamento com a Igreja de Roma entre 1496 a 1564.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Michelangelo Buonarroti, ao longo de seus oitenta e oito anos, serviu a nove papas, e o presente trabalho foca nestas relações entre o artista e os pontífices.Michelangelo foi o artista responsável pela escultura da Pietá, pela pintura do teto da Capela Sistina, pela pintura do Juízo Final, dos túmulos de pessoas importantes da Igreja e de projetos arquitetônicos como a fachada e a cúpula da Basílica de São Pedro.Todas estas obras foram envoltas em relacionamentos conturbados, intrigas artísticas e muito sofrimento por parte do artista, desta forma, estas questões tornaramse elementos-chave para a elaboração deste trabalho.Michelangelo Buonarroti, during his eighty-eight years, served nine popes, and the present work focuses on these relations between the artist and the pontiffs.Michelangelo was the artist responsible for the sculpture of Pietá, the painting of the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, the painting of The Last Judgment, the tombs of important people of the Church and architectural projects such as the facade and the dome of St. Peter's Basilica.All these works were surrounded by troubled relationships, artistic intrigues and much suffering on the part of the artist, so these questions became key elements for the elaboration of this work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".