Interregional correlation of disconformities in Upper Cretaceous strata, Western Interior Seaway: Biostratigraphic and sequence-stratigraphic evidence for eustatic change: Reply
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| May 01, 2016 Interregional correlation of disconformities in Upper Cretaceous strata, Western Interior Seaway: Biostratigraphic and sequence-stratigraphic evidence for eustatic change: Reply Ireneusz Walaszczyk; Ireneusz Walaszczyk 1Faculty of Geology, University of Warsaw, Al. Żwirki i Wigury 93, PL-02-089 Warszawa, Poland Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Joel A. Shank; Joel A. Shank 2Imperial Oil Resources, 237 4th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 3M9, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar A. Guy Plint A. Guy Plint † 3Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada †gplint@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ireneusz Walaszczyk 1Faculty of Geology, University of Warsaw, Al. Żwirki i Wigury 93, PL-02-089 Warszawa, Poland Joel A. Shank 2Imperial Oil Resources, 237 4th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 3M9, Canada A. Guy Plint † 3Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada †gplint@uwo.ca Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 19 Nov 2015 Revision Received: 10 Dec 2015 Accepted: 11 Jan 2016 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 © 2016 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2016) 128 (5-6): 1053–1055. https://doi.org/10.1130/B31457.1 Article history Received: 19 Nov 2015 Revision Received: 10 Dec 2015 Accepted: 11 Jan 2016 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Ireneusz Walaszczyk, Joel A. Shank, A. Guy Plint; Interregional correlation of disconformities in Upper Cretaceous strata, Western Interior Seaway: Biostratigraphic and sequence-stratigraphic evidence for eustatic change: Reply. GSA Bulletin 2016;; 128 (5-6): 1053–1055. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B31457.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search We are pleased to have this opportunity to address the main points raised by Krause and Braunberger (2015). In 1964, Scott and Cobban, in their study of the Peck Creek section, noted that the top of bed 29 was "very smooth," a description not applied by them to any other bed in the Fort Hays Limestone succession. The top of bed 29 was also singled out by Barlow and Kauffman (1985, p. 201) as a distinctive surface, termed PNF-4, that could be "...traced as a regional marker..." and "...may mark a minor disconformity in the middle of the... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.016 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".