MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239561837 · doi:10.3138/flor.20.029

Trent University

2003· article· en· W4239561837 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sarah Larratt Keefer

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorilegium · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceMedievalismLiberal arts educationClassicsThe artsHistoryLibrary scienceArt historyPolitical scienceLawMiddle AgesAncient historyHigher educationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of medievalism at Trent University, increasingly popular judged by student registration over the past decade, has just taken a new and exponential step forward with the approval by its Undergraduate Academic Development Committee of an Emphasis in Medieval and Renaissance Studies (M.A.R.S.), to begin in the Fall of 2003. Trent’s M.A.R.S. Emphasis is under the aegis of the Medieval Academy of America: Committee on Centers and Regional Associations (CARA), and is open to all students eligible for any Joint or Single Honours program of study in Arts or Science at Trent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlorilegiumSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207