MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239571254 · doi:10.18806/tesl.v26i2.420

Book Reviews

2009· article· en· W4239571254 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ellen Pilon, Jacqueline Foster, Roger Kenner, Hong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueTESL Canada Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrammarActive listeningEnglish grammarArtLinguisticsHumanitiesArt historyMedia studiesSociologyPhilosophyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviews of: 'English for Business Studies in Higher Education Studies,' by Carolyn Walker; 'English for Academic Study: Listening,' by Colin Campbell and Jonathan Smith; 'English for Academic Study: Speaking,' by Joan McCormack and Sebastian Watkins; 'The Hockey Sweater: An Interactive CD-ROM,' by Donna Mydlarski, Penthes Verena Rubrecht, Dana M. Paramskas, André Bougaïeff, and Larry Katz; 'Analyzing the Grammar of English (3rd ed.),' by Richard V. Teschner and Eston E. Evans

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTESL Canada JournalSame topicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and IdentityFrench-language works237,207