MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239577129 · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95943-3_234

Canterbury Christ Church, University College, Graduate School

2019· book-chapter· en· W4239577129 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Freedom and Discrimination
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGlobal Affairs CanadaCanadian Breast Cancer Research AllianceCamargo FoundationCanada Council for the ArtsKillam TrustsGovernment of Canada
KeywordsTheologySociologyMathematics educationPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

North Holmes Road, CT1 1QU, Canterbury, United Kingdom Tel :: (44) 1227 767 700 Fax :: (44) 1227 782 900 Email :: research@cant.ac.uk Website :: www.cant.ac.uk Contact :: Miss Ashleigh Stuart, Research Secretary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3360.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicReligious Freedom and DiscriminationFrench-language works237,207