Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Christopher Baugh, Theatre, Performance and Technology: The Development of Technology in the Twentieth Century, reviewed by Kathleen Irwin Scott T. Cummings, Remaking American Theater: Charles Mee, Anne Bogart and the SITI Company, reviewed by Peter A. Campbell Charles Grimes, Harold Pinter’s Politics: A Silence beyond Echo, reviewed by Mark Taylor-Batty Gad Kaynar And Linda Ben-Zvi, eds., Bertolt Brecht: Performance and Philosophy , reviewed by Astrid Oesmann Raymond Knapp, The American Musical and the Performance of Personal Identity, reviewed by Stacy Wolf Martin Puchner, Poetry of the Revolution: Marx, Manifestos, and the Avant-Gardes, reviewed by Matthew Rebhorn Mike Sell, Avant-Garde Performance and the Limits of Criticism: Approaching the Living Theatre, Happenings/Fluxus, and the Black Arts Movement, reviewed by Lisa Wolford Wylam Maurya Wickstrom, Performing Consumers: Global Capital and Its Theatrical Seductions , reviewed by Baz Kershaw
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.431 | 0.419 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".