Bibliographic record
Abstract
Souths Coleman Hutchison (bio) In recent years the study of the literature and culture of the U.S. South has been reinvigorated by a wholesale reassessment of the region's place in the world. Drawing on the methodological tools of comparative cultural history, postcolonial and globalization theories, and indigenous, transnational, and global south studies, the "New Southern Studies" has reimagined both its objects of study and its fields of inquiry. As a result, "Southernists" have begun to pay increasing attention to the itineraries of Southern culture: What are we to make of Faulkner's interest in Haiti? What can be said about Atlanta's emergence as an international industrial and cultural center? Such attention has rendered intelligible the global interests of Southern texts and occasioned a new critical emphasis on issues of empire, diaspora, immigration, cosmopolitanism, and cultural exchange. The four short pieces included in this section are written by leading lights in the New Southern Studies. Their respective approaches to the texts of the [End Page 63] U.S. South are as diverse and as far-flung as the locations that they compass and constellate: the Mississippi Delta and Mauritania; Baghdad, Mexico City, and New Orleans; Atlanta and Sudan; Canada, Columbia, Cuba, and the Carolinas. Taken together, these pieces suggest a vibrant and emergent critical discourse, one that has the potential to unsettle the ways American Studies scholars (among others) think and write about the region and its relation to the world. [End Page 64] Coleman Hutchison University of Texas at Austin Coleman Hutchison Coleman Hutchison is Assistant Professor of English at the University of Texas at Austin, where he teaches courses in nineteenth-century U.S. literature and culture, bibliography and textual studies, and poetry and poetics. Coleman's essays have appeared in American Literary History, Comparative American Studies, The Emily Dickinson Journal, and PMLA. He is currently finishing a book on Confederate literary culture. Copyright © 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.492 | 0.260 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".