MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Germany

2010· book-chapter· en· W4239616300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOECD economic outlook · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLaw and Political Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoarding (animal behavior)UnemploymentEconomicsInvestment (military)Quarter (Canadian coin)Labour economicsMomentum (technical analysis)Monetary economicsMacroeconomicsFinancial economicsPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The underlying growth momentum is intact, although negative one-offs affected the economy around the turn of the year. Growth is expected to pick up strongly from the second quarter onwards as the improvement in world trade continues and firms gradually raise their investment expenditures. The labour market continues to be exceptionally robust given the magnitude of the output contraction. Nevertheless, labour hoarding has left some enterprises with excess employment and some increase in layoffs and in unemployment is expected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3820.382

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOECD economic outlookSame topicLaw and Political ScienceFrench-language works237,207