Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract “Fully polarimetric” in its original radio science usage denotes a receiving instrument's ability to measure the four‐parameter Stokes vector characterizing the polarimetric properties of an electro‐magnetic (EM) field. In contrast, radar remote sensing specialists use “fully polarimetric” to apply exclusively to radars that evaluate the four complex scattering matrix elements. To disambiguate, polarimetric portrait is suggested, defined to be the Stokes vector of an unbiased EM field. For a passive system, this new name applies without qualification to the four Stokes parameters seen through a passive dual‐channel receiver. For an active system, the scene's illumination must have equal weighting between any two orthogonal polarizations to generate a polarimetrically unbiased reflected EM field. The suggested terminology is applicable to a variety of disciplines, including radiometry, alternative polarimetric radar architectures, radar astronomy, weather radar, and GPS/GNSS reflectometry. Polarimetric portraits obtained by dual‐polarized and quadrature‐polarized radars are shown to be equal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it