MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239730087 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-39754/v1

An Investigation of Spectrum of Diseases and Medication Use in Discharged Patients with Mental Disorders in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

2020· preprint· en· W4239730087 on OpenAlexaff
xue cao, Jun Ma, Yongyi Liu, Qihui Wang, Linan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInner mongoliaSpectrum (functional analysis)PsychiatryMedicineGeographyChinaPhysicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective We aim to investigate the inpatient status of patients with mental disorders who had been discharged from psychiatric hospitals in 2016 in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, and through this, to provide theoretical basis for further improving the security system for patients with mental disorders in this region. Method: A two-phased stratified sampling method was used to collect data from selected hospitals. Results: A total of 1646 cases with valid data were obtained. The most common mental diseases were schizophrenia and bipolar disorder; atypical antipsychotic drugs played a dominant role (95.78%) among various antipsychotics, with risperidone being the most frequently used drug. Conclusion: We need to further improve the management of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, as well as the hospital-community integration mode. Standardized training of residents and further education for clinicians should be enhanced to improve doctors’ clinical skills and promote drug prescribing in a scientific, rational and standardized manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessFrench-language works237,207