MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239732092 · doi:10.1177/1084822311414678

OASIS Update

2011· article· en· W4239732092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan S. Niewenhous

Bibliographic record

VenueHome Health Care Management & Practice · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationVariety (cybernetics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Face (sociological concept)MedicineHistoryComputer scienceSociologySocial scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Home care had undergone yet another round of changes during the first quarter of 2011. Changes in therapy documentation and the “face-to-face” requirement both settled in for good on April 1st. Yet only one question was posed to CMS during the preceding 3 months regarding either of these new requirements. Instead, insightful questions concerning a wide variety of OASIS items were posed for clarification, the synopsis of which follows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0170.013
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0140.007
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1830.157

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHome Health Care Management & PracticeSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207