MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239737101 · doi:10.1093/geront/gnv436.07

DEVELOPMENT OF A DRIVING ASSESSMENT PATHWAY FOR STROKE AND MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN AN IRISH ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL

2015· article· en· W4239737101 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Miller Polgar, Lynn Shaw, Jennifer Oxley, Anu Sirén, Judith Charlton, Steve O’Hern

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Gerontologist · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrishAcute strokeCognitive impairmentAcute careMedicineCognitive Assessment SystemAcute hospitalStroke (engine)CognitionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationEmergency medicineHealth carePsychiatryEmergency departmentEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

sensitivity and specificity for each test; the driving test was the gold standard. Using serial trichotomization we classified drivers as "pass/fail" or indeterminate on the driving test. Trails B had the best sensitivity and specificity (66.3% of participants correctly classified). Areas under the curve ranged from .89 to .98. After serial trichotomization 85% of participants were correctly classified at fit or un-fit to drive. Using serial trichotomization achieves greater precision than screening based on a single test and may reduce the need for behind-the-wheel driving tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe GerontologistSame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207